Hey Timothée,
[resending since last message was caught up in devel-owner somehow]
Thanks for pointing out the Atomic Desktops are missing and for your thoughts on the wiki page with the new toml file (ttps://pagure.io/fedora-kiwi-descriptions/blob/rawhide/f/maintainers.toml#_72). I am happy to retire the wiki, but was unsure if there were any references to that page that should be updated before deprecating the wiki page.
Also, another question for you if you don't mind. I was using https://fedoraproject.org/spins and https://fedoraproject.org/labs as my source of truth for all Spins/Labs. It seems it makes sense now to also use that toml file for these as well. Reading that file, would it be safe to say we should use the name that prepends the architecture for each? IE for this section, create a ticket for onyx?
[resending since last message was caught up in devel-owner somehow]
Thanks for pointing out the Atomic Desktops are missing and for your thoughts on the wiki page with the new toml file (ttps://pagure.io/fedora-kiwi-descriptions/blob/rawhide/f/maintainers.toml#_72). I am happy to retire the wiki, but was unsure if there were any references to that page that should be updated before deprecating the wiki page.
Also, another question for you if you don't mind. I was using https://fedoraproject.org/spins and https://fedoraproject.org/labs as my source of truth for all Spins/Labs. It seems it makes sense now to also use that toml file for these as well. Reading that file, would it be safe to say we should use the name that prepends the architecture for each? IE for this section, create a ticket for onyx?
On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 12:19 PM Allison King <alking@redhat.com> wrote:
Hey Timothée,
Thanks for pointing out the Atomic Desktops are missing and for your thoughts on the wiki page with the new toml file (ttps://pagure.io/fedora-kiwi-descriptions/blob/rawhide/f/maintainers.toml#_72). I am happy to retire the wiki, but was unsure if there were any references to that page that should be updated before deprecating the wiki page.
Also, another question for you if you don't mind. I was using https://fedoraproject.org/spins and https://fedoraproject.org/labs as my source of truth for all Spins/Labs. It seems it makes sense now to also use that toml file for these as well. Reading that file, would it be safe to say we should use the name that prepends the architecture for each? IE for this section, create a ticket for onyx?On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 11:14 AM <devel-owner@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:Your message to the devel mailing-list was rejected for the following
reasons:
The message is not from a list member
The original message as received by Mailman is attached.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Allison King <alking@redhat.com>
To: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com>
Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>, spins@lists.fedoraproject.org
Bcc:
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 11:11:56 -0500
Subject: Re: F44 Spins/Labs KeepaliveHey Timothée,
Thanks for pointing out the Atomic Desktops are missing and for your thoughts on the wiki page with the new toml file (ttps://pagure.io/fedora-kiwi-descriptions/blob/rawhide/f/maintainers.toml#_72). I am happy to retire the wiki, but was unsure if there were any references to that page that should be updated before deprecating the wiki page.
Also, another question for you if you don't mind. I was using https://fedoraproject.org/spins and https://fedoraproject.org/labs as my source of truth for all Spins/Labs. It seems it makes sense now to also use that toml file for these as well. Reading that file, would it be safe to say we should use the name that prepends the architecture for each? IE for this section, create a ticket for onyx?On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 10:52 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com> wrote:On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 10:47 AM Timothée Ravier <travier@redhat.com> wrote:Hey Alisson,The first batch looks good but I think we are missing all the Atomic Desktops, so we would need tickets for each Atomic Desktops variant as well.As you found out in https://pagure.io/fedora-pgm/schedule/issue/238, it appears that we have two sources for the Spin maintainers: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SpinsandLabs & https://pagure.io/fedora-kiwi-descriptions/blob/rawhide/f/maintainers.tomlIt would be good to retire the Wiki page and use only the one from the fedora-kiwi-descriptions repo.The entries assigned only to SciTech SIG are not valid, and we need to identify a real person to put as a primary maintainer. Otherwise we need to assume keepalive isn't possible for those deliverables.--真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!----
No comments:
Post a Comment